Jonathan Alter’s Hyper-Partisan Spin

By Mark Rhoads

An old college pal of mine was recently looking at a TV screen in a bar at the Atlanta Airport. He saw former fog-making-Newsweek editor and Bloomberg Review columnist Jonathan Alter on MSNBC and confused him with comic actor Jason Alexander. Then he wondered why Alexander would be talking about the debt ceiling negotiations between President Obama and Speaker Boehner.

“Alexander,” who may have been separated at birth from Chicago-native Alter, was whining about how the conservative Republicans were dishonest because they were saying how bad the deficit was, and yet would not accept a tax increase offer from President Obama to “reduce the deficit.” Marvelous false logic that.

First, its the spending, stupid, not the deficit number per se that is important. The deficit number is only the difference in one year between federal revenue and federal outlays. The national debt is the accumulated total of all the yearly deficits. By itself, the yearly deficit number is not an important number but is only a symptom of how much the government is over-spending.

Just watch, starting today the radical Left can take its cue from the hyper-left partisan Jonathan Alter to spread a new lie about House conservative Republicans and attack their motives. The new left-wing party line will be that Repubicans oppose reasonable proposals of Obama for reducing the deficit because they oppose raising taxes.

In a very twisted sense, that is true in the psuedo-logical world view of the radical Left. Its like saying a bank robber can help “reduce the crime rate:” if he only robs a little less money from banks every year.

The Jonathan Alters of the world naturally do not see themselves as partisan demagogues when they are so manifestly intellectually dishonest. It is worse than that: their rigid Left-wing ideology so blinds them to simple logic that they become intellectually obtuse servants of the Tower of Babel.

Originally published in Illinois Review

Advertisements

About Radnor Reports

Ken Feltman is past-president of the International Association of Political Consultants and the American League of Lobbyists. He is retired chairman of Radnor Inc., an international political consulting and government relations firm in Washington, D.C. Feltman founded the U.S. and European Conflict Indexes in 1988. The indexes have predicted the winner of every U.S. presidential election beginning in 1988, plus the outcome of several European elections. In May of 2010, the Conflict Index was used by university students in Egypt. The Index predicted the fall of the Mubarak government within the next year.
This entry was posted in Journalism, Ken Feltman, Mark Rhoads, Thought-Provoking Analysis and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s