How the Conservative GOP Base Can Win

By Mark Rhoads

In almost every GOP presidential cycle with no incumbent running over the last half-century, someone always makes the superficial argument that the party should nominate its most liberal credible candidate in order to appeal beyond its base conservative voters to win over more moderate Democrats and independents. There are several reasons why this argument is based on a false premise. Some of them are listed below.

One major reason is that the most successful GOP candidate of the last forty years, Ronald Reagan, was able to expand his base not by reaching out to more liberal voters outside the GOP, but by finding additional conservative-value voters among blue-collar Democrats and independents and also by motivating turnout of the base. For example, the current CNN poll of Republicans shows that party rank and file voters are overwhelmingly conservative in their beliefs.

For the beauty contest, the poll shows Republicans favor Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas) by 27 percent nationwide over former Gov. Mitt Romney (Partly RINOish-Massachusetts) with 14 percent. Sarah Palin follows Romney with ten percent and Michelle Bachmann follows Palin with 9 percent. Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani also measures at 9 percent and former House Speaker New Gingrich and Rep. Ron Paul are each the preferred choice of 6 percent. Rick Perry was also at the top of the GOP field by a wide margin in last week’s Gallup poll with Romney in a distant second place. If you add together the support levels of Perry, Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich, and Ron Paul you come up with a total of 58 percent of Republicans wanting a range of conservative to libertarian positions. If you combine the support of Mitt Romney and the widely admired former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, there is a total of 25 percent who favor candidates on the more moderate-to-liberal wing of the GOP. If the delegates elected to the national GOP convention are in any way representative of the rank and file GOP primary voters, and they usually are, the delegates will be conservatives by a wide margin which means a conservative platform and a nominee with distinctly conservative views.

There is little disagreement about the need to broaden a candidate’s base to win in November 2012. The only difference of opinion among the self-appointed party pros is what is the best way to broaden the base. Absent an incredible realignment election, Republican candidates have not in recent years have had much of a chance of carrying New York (31 electoral votes), Pennsylvania (21), Michigan (17), Illinois (21), California (55), Oregon (7), or Washington (11) for a starting Democratic advantage of 163 Electoral Votes. Even John McCain in 2008 who lost many former GOP states to Obama still managed to carry 22 states with 173 Electoral Votes. For a GOP candidate to win, the party must win back formerly red states carried by Obama in 2008 such as Florida (25), North Carolina (15), Virginia (13), Ohio (20), and Indiana (11) to add back 84 more electoral votes to the McCain list for a new total of 257 electoral votes or still 13 short of the majority of 270. Those 13 votes could be found in some combination of swing states such as New Jersey (15), Wisconsin (10), Minnesota (10), Iowa (7), New Mexico (5), or Colorado (9).

Also recall that Texas has gained four more electoral votes since the 2010 census which would make the GOP base of 22 states now yield 167 electoral votes instead of 163. There are other states in play in 2012 that normally would not be. Michigan (17) for example can normally be counted in the Democratic column but with an unemployment rate far above the national average, even Michigan could be deducted from the Blue column and added to the Red one. The unemployment rate in California in August was at a monstrous 13.3 percent and headed higher by the end of December. Republicans have not carried California for the presidential nominee since 1988 which was also the last time a Republican, George H.W. Bush, carried Illinois. If California tilts to the GOP column on Election Night 2012, everyone can go to bed early unless they are celebrating.

Of the 2008 Obama states that the GOP must get back in 2012, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, and Indiana are all in play for a conservative candidate who can motivate the enthusiasm of the bast to turnout in a similar way to how the Obama base turned out in 2008 while some of the GOP base stayed home. On the other hand a liberal GOP nominee would only help in very long-shot states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, or the West Coast.

About Radnor Reports

Ken Feltman is past-president of the International Association of Political Consultants and the American League of Lobbyists. He is retired chairman of Radnor Inc., an international political consulting and government relations firm in Washington, D.C. Know as a coalition builder, he has participated in election campaigns and legislative efforts in the United States and several other countries.
This entry was posted in Mark Rhoads, Politics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to How the Conservative GOP Base Can Win

  1. Guppy says:

    You just wrote that a big hat gunslinger from Texas with no cattle will have a hard time winning and now you write this that the cowboy can win. Which is it? You look a little undecided. Can the Texan with the fancy cowboy boots win?

  2. Pingback: Jobab

  3. c.o. says:

    You’re someone with a little originality. Useful!

  4. Lottie says:

    As a long time reader, I thank you for gving the conservative view point once in a while.

  5. Terlan says:

    And what did I learn about the sum and substance of Islam? I leanred that there is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet. That’s it. That’s what I leanred, which is nothing more than I did not know before. No reason whatsoever to become Muslim as an intellectual or theological matter.Why is this surprising? Since that is the central tenet of Islam, I might ask what else you expected to learn?What seems really weird to me, though, is why if the central tenet of a religion is that Muhammad is a prophet, you wouldn’t immediately think that in order to understand the religion you need to understand the teachings of the prophet, which are, by extension, central to that religion.I could say the same thing about Joseph Smith. Merely inviting Mormons to tell you why it is a “reason-based faith” is, I don’t think, a serious question because if you really were interested in understanding the religion or the people’s experience with it, your first question might not be “Is this faith reason-based or merely a cult?” but “What are the central beliefs of this faith AND what are their epistemological underpinnings? What is the role of reason as compared to other methods of epistemology? And if they believe in a prophet, what does that prophet say about reason and epistemology? And how do the people in the religion engage with the teaching of that prophet and with their own scripture? How do people in the religion engage with theological misunderstandings or questions?”What I’m merely suggesting is you might try to add a little depth to your own intellectual examination of other people’s religion, and you just might find what you’re looking for. I’m not saying you will believe any of it. But I’m suggesting you will at least understand larger groups of people and the power of traditions that, whether true or not, have shaped the world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.